Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 16;52:1. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052006258

Table 3. Obstetric practices performed during delivery, according to the presence of companion at that time, in women who went into labor. South Region of Brazil, 2011. (n = 2,324).

Variable Presence of companion in the delivery
Yes No PR 95%CI aPRc 95%CI
n % n %
In the delivery
Non-lithotomy position (n = 1,753) 49 7.1 41 3.9a 1.83 1.22-2.74” 1.77 1.16-2.72b
Episiotomy (n = 1,759) 393 56.7 519 48.7a 1.16 1.06-1.2 7” 1.01 0.93-1.11
Kristeller maneuver (n = 1,754) 188 27.2 383 36.0a 0.75 0.65-0.87a 0.67 0.58-0.78b
PPP room (n = 1,757) 133 19.2 156 14.7” 1.31 1.06-1.62” 1.62 1.31-2.00b
Skin-to-skin contact (n = 1,741) 456 66.1 390 3 7.1a 1.78 1.62-1.96” 1.81 1.64-1.99b
In the cesarean
Skin-to-skin contact (n = 309) 27 25.0 16 8.0a 3.14 1.77-5.57” 2.43 1.22-4.85b

PR: prevalence ratio; aPR: adjusted prevalence ratio; PPP: prepartum, delivery, postpartum; ABIPEME: Economic classification recommended by the Brazilian Association of Research Companies

a

Chi-square test: p < 0.05

b

Wald test: p < 0.05

c

Adjusted for age, education level, payment of the delivery (public or private), parity, and ABIPEME score.