Table 1.
Responsibility | Tier of Government | Comment | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FG | SG | LG | |||
Health policy making | *** | ** | — | Whilst the FG leads, SG participate through the National Council on Health | |
Regulation | Price | *** | ** | — | FG determines salary scales. SG can decide to adopt it or not. User fees are determined separately by FG and SG |
Quality | *** | * | — | FG sets health workers training curricula, licenses practitioners, facilities and commodities. SG participates in enforcement | |
Quantity | ** | * | — | FG and SG control location of public sector facilities. There is generally very little control over number of practitioners trained | |
Resource generation | *** | ** | * | LG lacks capacity to invest substantially in human capital development and health infrastructure | |
Planning, budgeting and resource allocation | *** | ** | * | A substantial share of the FG health budget is spent in providing support to SG and LG | |
Service provision | Primary Care | * | ** | *** | Primary care is provided at all levels but most of the primary health care responsibilities lie with the LG |
Secondary Care | ** | *** | — | Secondary care provision also happens at tertiary level health facilities | |
Tertiary Care | *** | ** | — | Many SG own tertiary level facilities, typically affiliated to universities as teaching hospitals | |
Monitoring and evaluation | *** | ** | ** | All tiers have established M&E mechanisms |
FG federal government, SG state government, LG local government, *** mostly responsible, ** partly responsible, * minimally responsible, − not responsible. For the purpose of simplicity, the roles played by private sector and donor organisations are excluded from the table
Source: Okpani AI; Abimbola S. 2015 [44]