Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Jul 27;37(1):116–127. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2732824

Fig. 5 — Comparison of reconstruction with different model components. CNR is plotted as a function of β at δ = 0.002/mm. (a) MCs of nominal size 0.15–0.18mm, (b) MCs of nominal size 0.18–0.25mm. The SQS-DBCN method yields MCs with higher CNR compared with the SQS-noDB or the SQS-noNC reconstruction over a wide range of β values.

Fig. 5 — Comparison of reconstruction with different model components. CNR is plotted as a function of β at δ = 0.002/mm. (a) MCs of nominal size 0.15–0.18mm, (b) MCs of nominal size 0.18–0.25mm. The SQS-DBCN method yields MCs with higher CNR compared with the SQS-noDB or the SQS-noNC reconstruction over a wide range of β values.