TABLE 6.
Data sets considered for the thermal conductivity of liquid nickel at 0.1 MPa
| First author | Publ. year | Ref. | Purity (mass %) | Technique employeda | Uncertainty quoted (%) | No. of data | Temp. Range (K) | Form of datab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previous reference value | ||||||||
| Mills | 1996 | [11] | 1 | 1728 | P | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Primary data | ||||||||
| Kobatake | 2010 | [58] | - | Electromagnetic levitation | - | 15 | 1711–1983 | D |
| Nishi | 2003 | [52] | - | Laser flash(TD) | 3.3 | 34 | 1728–1868 | D |
| Zinovyev | 1986 | [61] | 99.90 | Temperature wave (TD) | 5 | 3 | 1739–1769 | D |
|
| ||||||||
| Secondary data | ||||||||
| Nagata | 2003 | [17] | - | Transient hot wire | - | 2 | 1789,1822 | D |
| Ostrovskii | 1980 | [69] | 99.90 | ns | 26 | 1 | 1728 | P |
TD = thermal diffusivity measurement, ns = not stated
D = diagram, P = table data