Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jul 25;179:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.06.032

Table 3.

Logistic Multilevel Models Predicting Log Odds of Ever Using Stimulants to Get High

Parameter b SE p OR 95% CI OR
Intercept − 4.14 0.24 < .001 0.02 (0.01, 0.03)
Age 0.20 0.06 < .001 1.22 (1.09, 1.36)
Peer Modeling 0.17 0.02 < .001 1.19 (1.14, 1.23)
Parental Monitoring − 0.04 0.02 .020 0.96 (0.92, 0.99)
School Performance − 0.08 0.07 .250 0.92 (0.80, 1.06)
Region
  Northern Plains 0.16 0.25 .526 1.17 (0.70, 1.95)
  Northwest 0.58 0.59 .333 1.79 (0.53, 6.10)
  Southeast + Texas − 0.78 0.80 .342 0.46 (0.09, 2.42)
  Upper Great Lakes 1.14 0.27 < .001 3.13 (1.80, 5.42)
  Southwest
Female gender 0.08 0.19 .682 1.08 (0.75, 1.56)
Male gender
Prescribed by doctor 2.17 0.21 < .001 8.79 (5.86, 13.18)
Not prescribed by doctor

Note. OR = odds ratio.CI = confidence interval. ORs are exponentiated parameter estimates (b’s). Continuous predictors were centered at the grand mean. Models estimate the log odds conditional on the random effects. Bolded typeface indicates fixed effects that were significant at the p < .05 level.