Table 2.
Mother model
| Child Externalizing Model | Child Internalizing Model | Maternal Depressive Symptoms Model | Maternal Psychological Aggression Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated intercepts: | ||||
| During FP: | ||||
| Mean RSA | 5.850 (.212)*** | 6.045 (.185)*** | 6.451 (.131)*** | 6.210 (.166)*** |
| RSA Self-regulation | −.115 (.087) | −.037 (.095) | −.118 (.078) | −.056 (.083) |
| RSA Concordance | .289 (.069)*** | .326 (.065)*** | .197 (.051)*** | .233 (.053)*** |
| During CU: | ||||
| Mean RSA | 5.809 (.193)*** | 5.975 (1.83)*** | 6.345 (.128)*** | 6.057 (.133)*** |
| RSA Self-regulation | −.028 (.053) | −.015 (.073) | .094 (.073) | .035 (.056) |
| RSA Concordance | .351 (.058)*** | .235 (.068)*** | .217 (.058)*** | .210 (.052)*** |
| During TT: | ||||
| Mean RSA | 5.730 (.020)*** | 5.914 (.182)*** | 6.301 (.132)*** | 6.052 (.153)*** |
| RSA Self-regulation | .057 (.066) | .010 (.056) | .119 (.053)* | .079 (.057) |
| RSA Concordance | .080 (.066) | .118 (.065)† | .093 (.043)* | .118 (.053)* |
| Prediction of Mean RSA given: | ||||
| Main Effects: | ||||
| FP (0) vs. CU (1) | −.041 (.117) | −.069 (.112) | −.107 (.090) | −.153 (.091)† |
| FP (0) vs. TT (1) | −.120 (.125) | −.131 (.124) | −.150 (.107) | −.158 (.104) |
| CU (0) vs. TT (1) | −.079 (.124) | −.061 (.116) | −.044 (.093) | −.005 (.095) |
| RP during FP | .039 (.016)* | .029 (.018) | −.031 (.016)* | .001 (.007) |
| RP during CU | .034 (.014)* | .024 (.018) | −.031 (.016)* | .007 (.007) |
| RP during TT | .040 (.015)* | .026 (.018) | −.033 (.017)† | .007 (.004) |
| Interactions: | ||||
| RP during FP (0) vs. CU (1) | −.006 (.010) | −.005 (.014) | −.005 (.014) | .006 (.004) |
| RP during FP (0) vs. TT (1) | .001 (.008) | −.003 (.017) | −.003 (.017) | .003 (.005) |
| RP during CU (0) vs. TT (1) | .006 (.011) | .001 (.015) | .001 (.015) | −.003 (.004) |
| Prediction of RSA Self-Regulation given: | ||||
| Main Effects: | ||||
| FP (0) vs. CU (1) | .087 (.088) | .022 (.105) | .282 (.086)* | .091 (.076) |
| FP (0) vs. TT (1) | .172 (.112) | .048 (.115) | .236 (.088)** | .135 (.091) |
| CU (0) vs. TT (1) | .085 (.077) | .025 (.092) | −.001 (.008) | .044 (.062) |
| RP during FP | .009 (.006) | −.001 (.009) | .011 (.006)† | .002 (.004) |
| RP during CU | .007 (.006) | .011 (.010) | −.006 (.008) | .001 (.004) |
| RP during TT | .003 (.006) | .010 (.006)† | −.006 (.004) | .000 (.002) |
| Interactions: | ||||
| RP during FP (0) vs. CU (1) | −.002 (.007) | .011 (.014) | −.006 (.007)* | −.001 (.005) |
| RP during FP (0) vs. TT (1) | −.006 (.008) | .011 (.011) | −.017 (.006)** | −.002 (.005) |
| RP during CU (0) vs. TT (1) | −.005 (.007) | .000 (.011) | −.001 (.008) | −.002 (.004) |
| Prediction of RSA Concordance given: | ||||
| Main Effects: | ||||
| FP (0) vs. CU (1) | .062 (.080) | −.091 (.081) | .019 (.080) | −.023 (.066) |
| FP (0) vs. TT (1) | −.209 (.079)** | −.208 (.074)** | −.105 (.067) | −.115 (.071) |
| CU (0) vs. TT (1) | −.271 (.073)*** | −.118 (.082) | −.124 (.064)* | −.092 (.063) |
| RP during FP | −.011 (.005)* | −.019 (.007)** | −.001 (.004) | −.005 (.002)* |
| RP during CU | −.016 (.005)** | −.005 (.009) | −.004 (.008) | −.001 (.003) |
| RP during TT | .001 (.005) | −.002 (.007) | −.001 (.006) | −.003 (.003) |
| Interactions: | ||||
| RP during FP (0) vs. CU (1) | −.005 (.007) | .015 (.011) | −.002 (.009) | .003 (.004) |
| RP during FP (0) vs. TT (1) | .012 (.006)† | .017 (.009)† | .001 (.008) | .002 (.003) |
| RP during CU (0) vs. TT (1) | .017 (.006)** | .002 (.012) | .003 (.010) | −.001 (.004) |
Note: Values in table denote b(SE) unless noted otherwise. FP = Free Play Task; CU = Clean-up Task; TT = Teaching Task; RP = Risk for psychopathology.