Table 3.
Child model
| Child Externalizing Model | Child Internalizing Model | Maternal Depressive Symptoms Model | Maternal Psychological Aggression Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated intercepts: | ||||
| During FP: | ||||
| Mean RSA | 5.562 (.137)*** | 5.384 (.208)*** | 5.639 (.206)*** | 5.714 (.210)*** |
| RSA Self-regulation | 0.013 (.068) | 0.057 (.104) | .135 (.074)† | −.087 (.088) |
| RSA Concordance | 0.264 (.053)*** | 0.396 (.081)*** | .313 (.077)*** | .317 (.067)*** |
| During CU: | ||||
| Mean RSA | 5.119 (.133)*** | 5.204 (.223)*** | 4.983 (.184)*** | 5.170 (.203)*** |
| RSA Self-regulation | 0.056 (.053) | −0.007 (.073) | .133 (.073)† | .076 (.076) |
| RSA Concordance | 0.238 (.057)*** | 0.314 (.103)** | .311 (.094)** | .267 (.078)** |
| During TT: | ||||
| Mean RSA | 5.280 (.128)*** | 5.350 (.203)*** | 5.324 (.188)*** | 5.180 (.191)*** |
| RSA Self-regulation | 0.110 (.029)*** | 0.061 (.052) | .098 (.039)* | .108 (.040)** |
| RSA Concordance | 0.075 (.045) | 0.162 (.176)* | .068 (.057) | .078 (.059) |
| Prediction of Mean RSA given: | ||||
| Main Effects: | ||||
| FP (0) vs. CU (1) | −.386 (.184)* | .180 (.172) | −.656 (.158)*** | −.554 (.154)*** |
| FP (0) vs. TT (1) | −.282 (.200) | −.033 (.204) | −.315 (.184)† | −.534 (.175)** |
| CU (0) vs. TT (1) | .104 (.171) | .147 (.173) | .341 (.126)** | .010 (.137) |
| RP during FP | −.035 (.016)* | .025 (.030) | −.020 (.027) | −.012 (.009) |
| RP during CU | −.041 (.018)* | −.017 (.026) | .013 (.023) | −.007 (.010) |
| RP during TT | −.035 (.022) | −.011 (.029) | −.008 (.024) | .007 (.009) |
| Interactions: | ||||
| RP during FP (0) vs. CU (1) | −.006 (.016) | −.042 (.025)† | .034 (.016)* | .005 (.006) |
| RP during FP (0) vs. TT (1) | .000 (.021) | −.036 (.031) | .012 (.016) | .020 (.008)* |
| RP during CU (0) vs. TT (1) | .006 (.016) | .006 (.018) | −.022 (.016) | .014 (.007)* |
| Prediction of RSA Self-Regulation given: | ||||
| Main Effects: | ||||
| FP (0) vs. CU (1) | .065 (.113) | −.063 (.122) | −.002 (.090) | .163 (.094)† |
| FP (0) vs. TT (1) | .035 (.091) | .004 (.114) | −.037 (.076) | .195 (.083)* |
| CU (0) vs. TT (1) | −.029 (.086) | .067 (.073) | −.035 (.067) | .032 (.067) |
| RP during FP | .001 (.006) | −.007 (.015) | −.007 (.015)** | .009 (.003)** |
| RP during CU | −.002 (.006) | .010 (.007) | −.013 (.007)† | −.002 (.003) |
| RP during TT | .007 (.005) | .007 (.007) | .001 (.005) | .000 (.002) |
| Interactions: | ||||
| RP during FP (0) vs. CU (1) | −.002 (.008) | .016 (.014) | .004 (.010) | −.010 (.004)** |
| RP during FP (0) vs. TT (1) | .007 (.007) | .014 (.016) | .018 (.006)** | −.009 (.004)* |
| RP during CU (0) vs. TT (1) | .009 (.007) | −.003 (.008) | .014 (.009) | .001 (.004) |
| Prediction of RSA Concordance given: | ||||
| Main Effects: | ||||
| FP (0) vs. CU (1) | .068 (.128) | −.082 (.126) | −.002 (.133) | −.050 (.097) |
| FP (0) vs. TT (1) | −.290 (.094)** | −.234 (.099)* | −.245 (.093)** | −.239 (.078)** |
| CU (0) vs. TT (1) | −.358 (.112)** | −.004 (.013) | −.243 (.107)* | −.189 (.087)* |
| RP during FP | −.013 (.007) | −.019 (.010)† | −.008 (.006) | −.006 (.004)† |
| RP during CU | −.023 (.010)* | −.008 (.014) | −.008 (.013) | −.001 (.005) |
| RP during TT | −.002 (.008) | −.012 (.007)† | .001 (.004) | −.001 (.003) |
| Interactions: | ||||
| RP during FP (0) vs. CU (1) | −.010 (.014) | .011 (.018) | .000 (.015) | .005 (.006) |
| RP during FP (0) vs. TT (1) | .011 (.010) | .007 (.011) | .009 (.008) | .006 (.004) |
| RP during CU (0) vs. TT (1) | .022 (.011)* | −.004 (.013) | .008 (.013) | .001 (.006) |
Note: Values in table denote b(SE) unless noted otherwise. FP = Free Play Task; CU = Clean-up Task; TT = Teaching Task; RP = Risk for psychopathology.