Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 18;8:1071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19484-x

Figure 6.

Figure 6

S. epidermidis biofilms grown on different surfaces over a period of 6 days. (a) Representative CLSM images with LIVE/DEAD staining on different surfaces. (b) The images (1, 3, and 5) were taken at magnification of 8000×; Images (2, 4, and 6) were higher magnification (25000×) of the biofilms. More mature biofilms were found on the polished and the spear-type titanium surfaces, with extensive EPS (red arrows). By contrast, the pocket-type surface continued to exhibit small bacterial clusters that tended to wrap (red dash lines) around at the nano-spears that formed the pockets, with relatively little EPS (red arrows). (c) Biomass volume per area on the nanostructured substrates. *Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). (d) SEM image taken at magnification of 100, 000×, showed that S. epidermidis cells were further damaged and collapsed inside the pockets (red dash line) after 6 days. Three independent experiments were performed for each substrate type.