Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 11;62(1):20–38. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.17-62

Table 10.

Differences in ALSFRS-R scores between Cycle 1 (Baseline) and Cycle 6 (LOCF)

Treatment group Number of subjects Adjusted mean change from baseline
Between-group differences in adjusted mean
LS mean ± SE LS mean ± SE (95% CI) p value
Placebo 66 −7.50 ± 0.66 2.49 ± 0.76 (0.99, 3.98) p = 0.0013
Edaravone 68 −5.01 ± 0.64

Compared between treatment groups using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment group and three dynamic allocation factors. For patients with missing values at the end of cycle 6, data were imputed by the LOCF method, provided that they had completed at least to cycle 3. ALSFRS-R, Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale; CI, confidence interval; LOCF, last observation carried forward; LS, least squares; SE, standard error.