Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;62(1):94–99. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.17-69

Table 3.

Comparisons of vitamin D deficiency odds ratios according to decreased eGFR, elevated uACR and decreased eGFR plus elevated uACR

(n = 4,948)
Variables Category Vit. D deficiency [25(OH)D <15.0 ng/dl]
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Normal eGFR ≥60 and uACR <30 1 1 1 1
Elevated uACR uACR ≥30 1.070 (0.859–1.332) 1.208 (0.961–1.517) 1.247 (0.986–1.577) 1.312 (1.035–1.662)
Decreased eGFR eGFR <60 0.613 (0.388–0.968) 0.709 (0.445–1.127) 1.303 (0.789–2.152) 1.761 (1.062–2.919)
Decreased eGFR plus Elevated uACR eGFR <60 and uACR ≥30 0.987 (0.597–1.633) 1.172 (0.702–1.959) 3.089 (1.722–5.544) 3.549 (1.975–6.365)

25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Vit. D deficiency, 25(OH)D <15.0 ng/dl; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; uACR, urine microalbumin/creatinine ratio. Model 1 [odds ratio (OR), 95% CI)], Non-adjusted; Model 2 [OR, 95% CI], adjusted for alcohol drinking, SBP, DBP, BMI and WM; Model 3 [OR, 95% CI], Model 2 further adjusted for TGs, HDL-C, BUN and FBG; Model 4 [OR, 95% CI], Model 3 further adjusted for age.