Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 8;33(5):e36. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e36

Table 4. Relationships between CAPRA score and established classification criteria I and II, and final pathology in patients with IRPCa.

Classifications Established criteria I P Established criteria II P Final pathology P
Favorable Unfavorablea Favorable Unfavorableb Favorable Unfavorablec
CAPRA score < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
1 4 (3.7) 0 (0) 3 (4.0) 1 (0.8) 1 (0) 3 (1.8)
2 31 (28.7) 5 (5.3) 20 (26.7) 16 (12.5) 14 (36.8) 22 (13.3)
3 61 (56.5) 8 (8.4) 43 (57.3) 26 (20.3) 14 (36.8) 55 (33.3)
4 12 (11.1) 27 (28.4) 9 (12.0) 30 (23.4) 4 (10.5) 35 (21.2)
5 0 (0) 30 (31.6) 0 (0) 30 (23.4) 3 (7.9) 27 (16.4)
6 0 (0) 23 (24.2) 0 (0) 23 (18.0) 2 (5.3) 21 (12.7)
7 0 (0) 2 (2.1) 0 (0) 2 (1.6) 0 (0) 2 (1.2)

Values are presented as number (%). P values were obtained by linear-by-linear association.

CAPRA = Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment, IRPCa = intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Unfavorable disease was defined as aprimary Gleason pattern of 4 or ≥ 2 determinant of intermediate-risk factors at biopsy pathology; bcriteria I or percentage of positive biopsy cores ≥ 50%; cGleason score ≥ 7 or locally advanced disease at surgical pathology.