Table 2.
Phase | Assessment Criteria | Evaluation |
---|---|---|
Eligibility | Established by NIH: Citizenship status; Enrollment status | PSU Evaluation Committee |
Application Review | GPA (2.5 minimum) | Scoringa by Site Evaluation Committee, 0–2 scale. 3 reviewers per applicant; those receiving divergent scores (2-point difference on 2+ criteria) reviewed by 4th member. |
Exhibits curiosity/passion for learning | ||
Experience with research, mentoring, and/or leadership | ||
Interest in pursuing biomedical/social science career | ||
Demonstrates tenacity, grit, and/or academic determination | ||
Fit between student’s overall life experience with BUILD EXITO goals | ||
Essay 1: Influential experiences | Scoring by Site Evaluation Committee, 0–5 scale | |
Essay 2: Research and career aims | ||
Strength of Letters of Recommendation (2) | ||
Interviewing Applicants | Question 1: What challenges and barriers have you faced academically? What steps have you taken to overcome these challenges? | Site Evaluation Committee assess responses for: - Engagement - Passion for/interest in research - Passion for/interest in addressing health disparities - Academic commitment - Promise/Spark/Grit |
Question 2: What health issues have you observed or experienced in your community that have inspired you to find solutions? How do you believe that BUILD EXITO can help you address these challenges? | ||
Selection | Holistic evaluation of all criteria | Site Evaluation Committee |
aEvaluation rubric uses a point system reflecting the values of the project and the considerations most important for selecting and retaining BUILD EXITO Scholars. This rubric can be modified to suit the needs of each site and applicant pool. Sites are encouraged to establish a minimum number of points needed for advancement to the interview phase of the selection process