Table 6.
No. of participants (No. of studies) | Design | Quality assessment | Absolute effect | Quality | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | ||||
The mean age was 3.1 years. Data were collected cross-sectionally. Cardiometabolic health was assessed using an objective measure of blood pressure. | |||||||
276 (1) | Cross-sectionala | Serious risk of biasb | No serious inconsistency | No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision |
Screen-based sedentary behaviours:
Watching TV for ≥ 2 h/day was not associated with high blood pressure (compared to <2 h/day, Prevalence Ratio = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.5, 1.4, p = 0.568) [126]. |
Very lowc |
aIncludes 1 cross-sectional study [126]
bSerious risk of bias. Unknown reliability and validity of the exposure measure [126]
cThe quality of evidence from the cross-sectional study was downgraded from “low” to “very low” because of a serious risk of bias that diminished the level of confidence in the observed effects