Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;7(1):123–133. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1274

Table 2.

Major phase 3 trials involving chemotherapeutic agents in the advanced/metastatic gastric cancer setting

Trials No. of patients Treatment arms HR for death (P value) Primary endpoint comparison (in months)
Advanced gastric cancer – first line
Van Cutsem et al. 24 (V325 study group) 445 DCF versus CF TTP: 1.47 (<0.001) OS: 1.29 (0.02) TTP: 5.6 versus 3.7OS: 9.2 versus 8.6
Cunningham et al. 25 1,002 ECF versus ECX versus EOF versus EOX 0.80 (0.02) OS: 9.9 versus 9.9 versus 9.3 versus 11.2
Koizumi et al. 27 (SPIRITS) 305 S‐1 + Cisplatin versus S‐1 0.77 (0.04) OS: 13.0 versus 11.0
Advanced gastric cancer – Second line
Ford et al. 30 (COUGAR ‐ 02) 168 Docetaxel + ASC versus ASC 0.67 (0.01) OS: 5.2 versus 3.6
Thuss‐Patience et al. 31 (AIO) 40 Irinotecan + BSC versus BSC 0.48 (0.012) OS: 4.0 versus 2.4

HR, Hazard ratio; OS, Overall survival; DCF, Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5‐FU; CF, Cisplatin and 5‐FU; TTP, Time to progression; ECF, Epirubicin, Cisplatin and 5‐FU; ECX, Epirubicin, Cisplatin and Capecitabine; EOF, Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin and 5‐FU, EOX: Epirubicine, Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine; BSC, Best supportive care; ASC, Active symptom control.