Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 18;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1316-7

Table 2.

The relationships between UGP2 and CFL1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of PDC

Clinicopathological characteristics Cases UGP2 CFL1
Positive (%) χ 2 P value Positive (%) χ 2 P value
Age
 ≤ 45 years old 22 13 (59.1) 0.004 0.949 14 (63.6) 1.301 0.254
 > 45 years old 84 49 (58.3) 42 (50.0)
Gender
 Male 61 30 (49.2) 5.130 0.024 31 (50.8) 0.233 0.629
 Female 45 32 (71.1) 25 (55.6)
Differentiation degree
 Highly differentiated 38 14 (36.8) 16.804 0.000 13 (34.2) 17.126 0.000
 Moderately differentiated 35 20 (57.1) 16 (45.7)
 Poorly differentiated 33 28 (84.8) 27 (81.8)
Maximum diameter
 ≤ 3 cm 13 5 (38.5) 4.063 0.131 4 (30.8) 3.791 0.150
 3–5 cm 68 39 (57.4) 36 (52.9)
 > 5 cm 25 18 (72.0) 16 (64.0)
Lymph node metastasis
 No 77 38 (49.4) 9.684 0.002 33 (42.9) 11.233 0.001
 Yes 29 24 (82.8) 23 (79.3)
Invasiona
 No 42 13 (31.0) 21.728 0.000 15 (35.7) 8.178 0.004
 Yes 64 49 (76.6) 41 (64.1)
TNM stage
 I 11 3 (27.3) 20.074 0.000 2 (18.2) 11.171 0.011
 II 42 17 (40.5) 20 (47.6)
 III 37 28 (75.5) 21 (56.8)
 IV 16 14 (87.5) 13 (81.3)

aInvasion into the surrounding tissues and organs