Table 4.

MIRO items ordered by compliance (COM), including the rating (RAT) from the ontology survey”

MIRO item	RAT	COM	CRF
SRD: Scope and coverage	4.15	100.00	MH
Content: KR language	4.11	100.00	MH
Motivation: Target audience	3.94	100.00	MH
Motivation: Need	3.85	100.00	MH
Content: Axiom patterns	3.80	100.00	MH
Basics: Ontology URL	4.72	93.33	MH
Content: Ontology relationships	4.13	93.33	MH
SRD: Development community	3.77	93.33	MH
Basics: Ontology name	4.71	90.00	MH
QA: Examples of usage	4.19	86.67	MH
Content: Incorporation of other ontologies	4.09	86.67	MH
Motivation: Competition	3.96	80.00	MH
KA: Knowledge acqu. methodology	3.93	80.00	MH
Content: Ontology metrics	3.42	80.00	SH
Content: Development environment	2.88	73.33	OM
QA: Evaluation	3.99	66.67	MM
Content: Upper ontology	3.88	66.67	MM
KA: Content selection	3.38	66.67	SM
Basics: Ontology owner	4.53	53.33	MM
Basics: Ontology repository	4.01	53.33	MM
SRD: Communication	3.80	40.00	ML
Content: Entity metadata policy	3.89	33.33	ML
Basics: Ontology license	4.50	26.67	ML
QA: Testing	3.87	26.67	ML
Content: Entity naming conventions	3.74	26.67	ML
KA: Source knowledge location	3.36	26.67	SL
Content: Identifier generation policy	3.86	6.67	MV
Change: Versioning policy	3.80	6.67	MV
Change: Sustainability plan	3.89	0.00	MV
Change: Entity deprecation strategy	3.83	0.00	MV

The compliance-rating factor (CRF) is described in “Compliance of existing papers with MIRO guidelines” section