Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 19;23(1):016011. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.1.016011

Table 1.

Mean difference±SEM of between groups’ comparisons for CF, dLVP, diaLVP, and RPP to evaluate the overall performance (min 1 to 90) by TC comparisons and recovery of hearts during early reperfusion phase (min 31 to 35) and final reperfusion injury phase (min 50 to 90).

  CF (ml/min) dLVP (mmHg) diaLVP (mmHg) RPP (HR × mmHg)
TCirr versus Tcnon min 1 to 90 2.23±0.67a 29.12±4.88a 0.11±3.57 7835±2971a
IRirr versus IRnon min 31 to 35 0.13±0.89 15.93±5.26a 7.84±6.79 2030±2501
min 50 to 90 0.20±0.73 2.50±4.63 5.55±5.78 1381±2386
IRnon versus TCnon min 31 to 35 2.01±0.94 43.42±5.94a 37.40±7.12a 14,431±2623a
min 50 to 90 2.49±0.76a 32.60±4.85a 25.37±6.06a 10,840±2502a
IRirr versus TCirr min 31to 35 0.27±1.09 30.07±6.94a 29.56±8.31a 8769±3064a
min 50 to 90 0.21±0.89 15.50±5.67 20.42±7.08a 5646±2922
a

Indicates significant difference.