Table 1.
Author | Setting | Period | Number of EA patients | Prenatal detection rate (%) | Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pini Prato et al7 | Italian National Register | 2012 | 146 | 29.6 | Prenatal diagnosis significantly more frequent in Gross’ types A and B EA, compared with types C and D EA (8/10=80% vs 34/131=26%) |
Leoncini et al8 | Western Australian Register of Developmental Anomalies (WARDA) | 1980–2009 | 260 | 7.7 | Prenatal detection rate increased during the study period, with a corresponding decrease in the proportion of cases diagnosed in the first week of life |
Garabedian et al9 | French National Register | 2008–2010 | 408 | 18.1 | The morbidity rate for infants with prenatal diagnosis is significantly higher than for infants with postnatal diagnosis, with no difference in mortality rate |
Abbreviation: EA, esophageal atresia.