Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1455–1463. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2216

Table 2.

Regression Coefficients Estimating SCD From EC and IT Tau and Covariatesa

Covariate by Model (R2 Value) β (95% CI) P Value Bootstrapped P Valueb Relative Importance (% Explained of R2 Value)c
Model 2a (0.24)
 EC tau 0.35 (0.19 to 0.52) <.001 <.001 47
 Age 0.06 (−0.11 to 0.23) .49 .36 11
 Male 0.11 (−0.04 to 0.27) .15 .69 4
 Educational attainment −0.06 (−0.21 to 0.10) .48 .59 0
 Adjusted GDS score 0.30 (0.14 to 0.45) <.002 <.001 36
 Time from NP to FTP-PET 0.05 (−0.10 to 0.20) .53 .53 0
Model 2b (0.14)
 IT tau 0.10 (−0.08 to 0.28) .27 .32 10
 Age 0.14 (−0.04 to 0.32) .13 .10 25
 Male 0.08 (−0.08 to 0.25) .34 .42 5
 Educational attainment −0.02 (−0.19 to 0.14) .79 .91 0
 Adjusted GDS 0.28 (0.11 to 0.44) .001 <.001 58
 Time from NP to FTP-PET 0.05 (−0.11 to 0.22) .53 .53 1
Model 3 (0.18)
 Aβ FLR 0.24 (0.08 to 0.40) .005 .005 29
 Age 0.13 (−0.04 to 0.30) .13 .11 19
 Male 0.08 (0.14 to 0.46) .31 .39 4
 Educational attainment −0.03 (−0.20 to 0.13) .67 .77 0
 Adjusted GDS 0.30 (0.14 to 0.46) <.001 <.001 47
 Time from NP to FTP-PET 0.05 (−0.11 to 0.21) .56 .56 0
Post hoc EC tau and IT tau model (0.25)
 EC tau 0.45 (0.24 to 0.65) <.001 <.001 45
 IT tau −0.16 (−0.37 to 0.04) .12 .03 6
 Age 0.09 (−0.08 to 0.27) .29 .18 10
 Male 0.10 (−0.05 to 0.26) .20 .40 4
 Educational attainment −0.04 (−0.20 to 0.12) .61 .87 0
 Adjusted GDS 0.29 (0.14 to 0.45) <.001 <.001 33
 Time from NP to FTP-PET 0.04 (−0.11 to 0.20) .59 .59 0
Model 4a (0.25)
 EC tau 0.36 (0.15 to 0.58) .001 <.001 35
 Age 0.04 (−0.13 to 0.21) .66 .58 8
 Male 0.10 (−0.05 to 0.26) .20 .09 4
 Educational attainment −0.06 (−0.21 to 0.10) .48 .54 0
 Adjusted GDS 0.30 (0.14 to 0.46) <.01 <.001 35
 Aβ FLR 0.13 (−0.06 to 0.33) .18 0.05 11
 EC tau × Aβ FLR −0.36 (−0.34 to 0.09) .25 .18 4
 Time from NP to FTP-PET 0.03 (−0.12 to 0.19) .67 .67 0
Model 4b (0.19)
 IT tau −0.14 (−0.76 to 0.47) .65 .79 5
 Age 0.14 (−0.05 to 0.32) .15 .11 16
 Male 0.08 (−0.08 to 0.25) .31 .53 4
 Educational attainment −0.04 (−0.20 to 0.13) .66 .78 0
 Adjusted GDS 0.30 (0.14 to 0.46) <.001 <.001 48
 Aβ FLR 0.22 (0.03 to 0.41) .03 .02 25
 IT tau × Aβ FLR 0.16 (−0.47 to 0.79) .61 .64 0
 Time from NP to FTP-PET 0.05 (−0.11 to 0.21) .53 .53 0

Abbreviations: Aβ, β-amyloid; APOEε4, apolipoprotein E ε4 allele; DVR, distribution volume ratio; EC, entorhinal cortex; FLR, frontal, lateral, and retrosplenial; FTP-PET, flortaucipir F 18 positron emission tomography; GDS, Geriatric Depression Score; IT, inferior temporal cortex; NA, not applicable; NP, neuropsychological testing; PVC, partial volume correction; SCD, subjective cognitive decline; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratios.

a

All variables are centered. Models are described in the Statistical Analysis subsection of the Methods section.

b

Nonparametric local linear kernel-based estimation using independently identically distributed draw bootstrapping (time from NP not included in model).

c

Relative importance using the metric of Lindemann et al.34