Table 2.
Regression Coefficients Estimating SCD From EC and IT Tau and Covariatesa
| Covariate by Model (R2 Value) | β (95% CI) | P Value | Bootstrapped P Valueb | Relative Importance (% Explained of R2 Value)c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 2a (0.24) | ||||
| EC tau | 0.35 (0.19 to 0.52) | <.001 | <.001 | 47 |
| Age | 0.06 (−0.11 to 0.23) | .49 | .36 | 11 |
| Male | 0.11 (−0.04 to 0.27) | .15 | .69 | 4 |
| Educational attainment | −0.06 (−0.21 to 0.10) | .48 | .59 | 0 |
| Adjusted GDS score | 0.30 (0.14 to 0.45) | <.002 | <.001 | 36 |
| Time from NP to FTP-PET | 0.05 (−0.10 to 0.20) | .53 | .53 | 0 |
| Model 2b (0.14) | ||||
| IT tau | 0.10 (−0.08 to 0.28) | .27 | .32 | 10 |
| Age | 0.14 (−0.04 to 0.32) | .13 | .10 | 25 |
| Male | 0.08 (−0.08 to 0.25) | .34 | .42 | 5 |
| Educational attainment | −0.02 (−0.19 to 0.14) | .79 | .91 | 0 |
| Adjusted GDS | 0.28 (0.11 to 0.44) | .001 | <.001 | 58 |
| Time from NP to FTP-PET | 0.05 (−0.11 to 0.22) | .53 | .53 | 1 |
| Model 3 (0.18) | ||||
| Aβ FLR | 0.24 (0.08 to 0.40) | .005 | .005 | 29 |
| Age | 0.13 (−0.04 to 0.30) | .13 | .11 | 19 |
| Male | 0.08 (0.14 to 0.46) | .31 | .39 | 4 |
| Educational attainment | −0.03 (−0.20 to 0.13) | .67 | .77 | 0 |
| Adjusted GDS | 0.30 (0.14 to 0.46) | <.001 | <.001 | 47 |
| Time from NP to FTP-PET | 0.05 (−0.11 to 0.21) | .56 | .56 | 0 |
| Post hoc EC tau and IT tau model (0.25) | ||||
| EC tau | 0.45 (0.24 to 0.65) | <.001 | <.001 | 45 |
| IT tau | −0.16 (−0.37 to 0.04) | .12 | .03 | 6 |
| Age | 0.09 (−0.08 to 0.27) | .29 | .18 | 10 |
| Male | 0.10 (−0.05 to 0.26) | .20 | .40 | 4 |
| Educational attainment | −0.04 (−0.20 to 0.12) | .61 | .87 | 0 |
| Adjusted GDS | 0.29 (0.14 to 0.45) | <.001 | <.001 | 33 |
| Time from NP to FTP-PET | 0.04 (−0.11 to 0.20) | .59 | .59 | 0 |
| Model 4a (0.25) | ||||
| EC tau | 0.36 (0.15 to 0.58) | .001 | <.001 | 35 |
| Age | 0.04 (−0.13 to 0.21) | .66 | .58 | 8 |
| Male | 0.10 (−0.05 to 0.26) | .20 | .09 | 4 |
| Educational attainment | −0.06 (−0.21 to 0.10) | .48 | .54 | 0 |
| Adjusted GDS | 0.30 (0.14 to 0.46) | <.01 | <.001 | 35 |
| Aβ FLR | 0.13 (−0.06 to 0.33) | .18 | 0.05 | 11 |
| EC tau × Aβ FLR | −0.36 (−0.34 to 0.09) | .25 | .18 | 4 |
| Time from NP to FTP-PET | 0.03 (−0.12 to 0.19) | .67 | .67 | 0 |
| Model 4b (0.19) | ||||
| IT tau | −0.14 (−0.76 to 0.47) | .65 | .79 | 5 |
| Age | 0.14 (−0.05 to 0.32) | .15 | .11 | 16 |
| Male | 0.08 (−0.08 to 0.25) | .31 | .53 | 4 |
| Educational attainment | −0.04 (−0.20 to 0.13) | .66 | .78 | 0 |
| Adjusted GDS | 0.30 (0.14 to 0.46) | <.001 | <.001 | 48 |
| Aβ FLR | 0.22 (0.03 to 0.41) | .03 | .02 | 25 |
| IT tau × Aβ FLR | 0.16 (−0.47 to 0.79) | .61 | .64 | 0 |
| Time from NP to FTP-PET | 0.05 (−0.11 to 0.21) | .53 | .53 | 0 |
Abbreviations: Aβ, β-amyloid; APOEε4, apolipoprotein E ε4 allele; DVR, distribution volume ratio; EC, entorhinal cortex; FLR, frontal, lateral, and retrosplenial; FTP-PET, flortaucipir F 18 positron emission tomography; GDS, Geriatric Depression Score; IT, inferior temporal cortex; NA, not applicable; NP, neuropsychological testing; PVC, partial volume correction; SCD, subjective cognitive decline; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratios.
All variables are centered. Models are described in the Statistical Analysis subsection of the Methods section.
Nonparametric local linear kernel-based estimation using independently identically distributed draw bootstrapping (time from NP not included in model).
Relative importance using the metric of Lindemann et al.34