Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Aug 1;11(2):e69–e83. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.07.007

Table 2.

Comparisons of process-of-care estimates between IV models, as-treated models, and post-hoc IV modelsa for each outcome

Outcome/Process measure Methods
As-treated methods IV methods Post-hoc IV methodsa
Coefficient
(SE)
P-value 95% CI Coefficient
(SE)
P-value 95% CI Coefficient
(SE)
P-value 95% CI
SBP change
No. Counseling session −0.45
(0.24)
0.06 (−0.92, −0.02) −10.82
(14.79)
0.46 (−39.80, 18.16) −5.30
(1.13)
<0.001 (−7.52, −3.08)
No. Medications −0.05
(0.46)
0.92 (−0.94, 0.85) 10.78
(23.19)
0.64 (−34.66, 56.23) −7.19
(1.57)
<0.001 (−10.27, −4.12)
DBP change
No. Counseling session −0.10
(0.14)
0.49 (−0.38, 0.18) −0.43
(3.04)
0.89 (−6.38, 5.53) −1.65
(0.52)
0.002 (−2.68, −0.63)
No. Medications −0.28
(0.23)
0.23 (−0.74, 0.18) −1.67
(5.00)
0.74 (−11.48, 8.14) −2.68
(0.81)
0.001 (−4.26, −1.10)
Total costs
No. Counseling session 33.02
(4.69)
< 0.001 (23.80, 42.24) −383.15
(677.64)
0.57 (−1711.31, 945.01) 89.08
(14.74)
< 0.001 (60.18, 117.98)
No. Medications 90.57
(8.74)
< 0.001 (73.41, 107.74) 832.18
(1051.69)
0.43 (−1229.11, 2893.46) 191.81
(25.08)
< 0.001 (142.66, 240.96)
a

Post-hoc instrumental variable methods included one process measure as an endogenous regressor and the other process measure as a control variable.