TABLE 4.
Participants’ Reported Likelihood of Adopting and Using the Described Implanted CGM Device in Surveys 1 and 2
| Percentage Identifying | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Definitely Yes | Likely | Definitely + Likely | Unlikely | Definitely Not | |
| Survey 1: Adults with type 1 diabetes | |||||
| Current user/switching (n = 266) | 43 | 47 | 90 | 8 | 1 |
| Past user/resuming (n = 174) | 36 | 53 | 89 | 10 | 1 |
| Nonuser/starting (n = 122) | 50 | 39 | 89 | 8 | 2 |
| Survey 1: Adults with type 2 diabetes | |||||
| Current user/switching (n = 16) | 31 | 38 | 69 | 31 | 0 |
| Past user/resuming (n = 32) | 22 | 66 | 88 | 6 | 6 |
| Nonuser/starting (n = 91) | 51 | 43 | 94 | 5 | 1 |
| Survey 2: Adults with type 1 diabetes | |||||
| Current user/switching (n = 383) | 44 | 42 | 86 | 11 | 3 |
| Past user/resuming (n = 76) | 63 | 30 | 93 | 7 | 0 |
| Nonuser/starting (n = 74) | 49 | 35 | 84 | 12 | 4 |
| Survey 2: Parents of children with type 1 diabetes | |||||
| Current user/switching (n = 80) | 30 | 49 | 79 | 21 | 0 |
| Past user/resuming (n = 9) | 22 | 56 | 78 | 22 | 0 |
| Nonuser/starting (n = 25) | 36 | 44 | 80 | 16 | 4 |