Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep;52(8):709–714. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000849

Table 3.

Comparison of primary and secondary outcomes between pre- and post-intervention groups, controlling for ASA group.

Pre-intervention Group (n = 524) Post-intervention Group (n = 445) P-value
Adequate bowel preparations 223 (42.5%) 381 (85.7%) <0.01
Adequate bowel preparations if “fair” included as “Adequate” 407 (77.8%) 381 (85.7%) <0.01
Repeated inpatient colonoscopies due to an inadequate preparation 22 (4.2%) 9 (2.0%) 0.06
Repeated colonoscopies (inpatient or outpatient within 3 months) due to an inadequate preparation 24 (4.6%) 9 (2.0%) 0.03
Delayed inpatient colonoscopies due to an inadequate preparation 34 (6.5%) 33 (7.4%) 0.57
Hospital days following preparation initiation to time of discharge* 8.0 ± 11.4 6.9 ± 8.8 0.02

Statistical significance was determined via the Cochrane-Mantel-Haenszel test controlling for ASA class.

*

Hospital length of stay analyzed through truncated negative binomial regression controlling for ASA class, as this covariate was significantly associated with hospital days.