Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 19;17(1):67–75. doi: 10.1002/wps.20491

Table 1.

Demographic features of the two samples

UCLA site NYC site
CHR+
(N=19)
CHR–
(N=40)
CTR
(N=21)
FEP
(N=16)
CHR+
(N=5)
CHR–
(N=29)
Age at baseline (years, mean±SD) 17.3 ± 3.7 16.4 ± 3.0 18.0 ± 2.8 15.8 ± 1.7a 22.2 ± 3.4 21.2 ± 3.6
Gender (% male) 89.5 55.0b 61.9b 68.7 80.0 65.5
Ethnicity (% Caucasian) 63.1 50.0 66.7 62.5 40.0 37.9
Parental socio‐economic status (Hollingshead index, mean±SD) 4.4 ± 2.1a 4.4 ± 1.7a 5.7 ± 1.4 4.9 ± 1.8 NA NA

Significant differences at p<0.05 level: avs. CTR, bvs. CHR+

UCLA – University of California Los Angeles, NYC – New York City, CHR+ – clinical high‐risk subjects who converted to psychosis during follow‐up, CHR– – clinical high‐risk subjects who did not convert to psychosis during follow‐up, CTR – healthy controls, FEP – subjects with first‐episode psychosis, NA – not available