Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 19;17(1):67–75. doi: 10.1002/wps.20491

Table 2.

Syntactic and semantic features used for predictive modeling

Description Example
a. Adjective, comparative “braver”, “closer”, “cuter”
b. Possessive pronoun “her”, “his”, “mine”, “my”, “our”, “ours”, “their”, “your”
c. WH‐determiner “that”, “which”, “what”
d. WH‐pronoun “that”, “what”, “which”, “who”, “whom”
e. WH‐adverb “how”, “however”, “whenever”, “why”
f. Minimum coherence at 5‐level, normalized
g. Minimum coherence at 5‐level
h. 90th percentile coherence at 5‐level
i. Maximum coherence at 6‐level
j. Mean coherence at 7‐level, normalized
k. Standard deviation coherence at 7‐level, normalized
l. 90th percentile at 7‐level
m. Standard deviation coherence at 7‐level
n. 90th percentile at 8‐level

A k‐level measure of semantic coherence was used, which computes word‐to‐word variability at “k” inter‐word distances, with k ranging from 5 to 8