Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 19;8:1187. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19459-y

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Behavioral assessment of motor and cognitive functions in IE rats. (a–d) Open field test (OFT). (a) IE and SC animals performed similarly in the open field arena when the exploration was measured as mean distance to the arena border (SC P30, n = 16; IE P30, n = 16; t-test, p = 0.84). (b,c) T-test revealed that the IE behavior was different from that of SC animals both in terms of total distance moved and mean velocity in the open field maze (t-test, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). (d) The percentage of time spent in the center part of the arena was not different between SC and IE rats (t-test, p = 0.933). (e) Assessment of sensorimotor coordination through vertical ladder climbing (VLT) confirmed a motor deficit in IE animals respect to SC (SC P30, n = 12; IE P30, n = 12; t-test, p < 0.05). (f–h) Object recognition task (ORT). (f) Both SC and IE rats spent equal amount of time exploring the two objects (OBJ1 and OBJ2) during the familiarization phase of the Object Recognition Test (SC P30, n = 16; IE P30, n = 16; paired t-test, p = 0.46 and p = 0.097). (g,h) SC showed a good information retention after both 1 and 24 hours (paired t-test, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively), while IE animals did not recognize the new object (NEW) with respect to the old one (OLD) either after 1 or after 24 hours (paired t-test, p = 0.06 and p = 0.08, respectively). Histograms represent average values ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.