Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Laryngoscope. 2017 Jul 21;128(4):982–990. doi: 10.1002/lary.26738

Table 3. Meta-analysis of Correlations Results.

r 95% CI I2 p
Subtotal: CI-specific QOL
 Word recognition in quiet 0.213 0.117 – 0.304 0.00% 0.7679
 Sentence recognition in quiet 0.241 0.0830 – 0.386 0.00% 0.5840
 Sentence recognition in noise 0.255 -0.0783 – 0.537 75.61% 0.0064
Subtotal: Hearing-specific QOL
 Word recognition in quiet 0.276 0.142 – 0.367 48.09% 0.0726
 Sentence recognition in quiet 0.204 0.0701 – 0.330 0.00% 0.9925
 Sentence recognition in noise NA NA NA NA
Total
 Word recognition in quiet 0.239 0.166 – 0.309 14.58% 0.2902
 Sentence recognition in quiet 0.219 0.118 – 0.316 0.00% 0.9716
 Sentence recognition in noise 0.238 -0.0535 – 0.493 68.19% 0.0135

Pooled correlation values (r and 95% confidence interval [CI]) and heterogeneity statistics (I2 and p) for meta-analysis of correlations. NA: Not Available