Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Neurol. 2017 Aug 19;82(2):247–258. doi: 10.1002/ana.24996

Table 3. Influence of AD co-pathology and mutation status on cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau levels in FTLD.

Table displays optimal multivariate model using natural-log transformed cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated-tau measurement as the dependent variable to test A) the independent association of the categorical presence of Alzheimer’s disease co-pathology (i.e. AD Braak tau co-pathology stage=B2/B3 vs B0/B1) in the total FTLD cohort (Model R2=0.14, F(4,71)=2.8, p<0.05) and B) the independent association of the presence of a pathogenic mutation with CSF p-tau measurement in the subset of patients with “pure” (AD Braak tau co-pathology stage=B0/B1) FTLD (Model R2=0.20, F(4,58)=3.5, p<0.02).

A) TOTAL FTLD COHORT
VARIABLE Beta (95% CI) T-VALUE P-VALUE
AD co-pathology (Braak B2/B3 vs B0/B1) 0.4 (0.04 – 0.7) 2.3 0.027
FTLD Pathology Group (FTLD-Tau vs FTLD-TDP) 0.2 (−0.06 – 0.5) 01.54 0.127
Age at CSF Collection (years) 0.01 (−0.002 – 0.02) 1.7 0.086
CSF Collection- Death Interval (years) 0.01 (−0.03 – 0.06) 0.6 0.545
Intercept 1.5 (0.6 – 2.3) 3.6 0.001
B) “PURE” FTLD COHORT
VARIABLE Beta (95% CI) T-VALUE P-VALUE
Mutation Status 0.3 (0.004 – 0.5) 2.0 0.047
FTLD Pathology Group (FTLD-Tau vs FTLD-TDP) 0.3 (0.1 – 0.6) 2.9 0.005
Age at CSF Collection (years) 0.01 (0 – 0.02) 1.9 0.052
CSF Collection- Death Interval (years) 0.003 (−0.03 – 0.04) 0.2 0.865
Intercept 1.4 (0.6 – 2.1) 3.5 0.001