Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr 9;225(1):28–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.015

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Risk Factors Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Variable Univariate Multivariate
HR 95% CI p
Value
HR 95% CI p
Value
Age, y, ≤58 vs >58 1.08 0.73 to 1.56 0.745
Sex, male vs female 1.48 0.89 to 2.50 0.129
Race, non-Caucasian vs Caucasian 0.89 0.46 to 1.69 0.703
BMI, kg/m2, ≤28 vs >28 0.86 0.59 to 1.25 0.433
AFP before OLT, ng/mL (≤500 vs >500) 1.46 0.67 to 3.12 0.342
Etiology, non-viral vs viral 1.29 0.84 to 1.98 0.255
LRT, no vs yes 1.02 0.69 to 1.49 0.933
LRT, single vs multiple 0.84 0.48 to 1.47 0.560
MELD score, ≤20 vs >20 1.45 0.88 to 2.38 0.142
Explanted tumor
  No. of tumors, ≤3 vs >3 5.94 2.44 to 14.4 0.001 3.26 1.28 to 8.27 0.031
  Tumor size, ≤3 cm vs >3 cm 3.15 1.56 to 6.37 0.001 1.99 0.96 to 4.16 0.043
  Macrovascular invasion, no vs yes 7.95 3.24 to 19.4 0.006 4.56 1.64 to 12.7 0.004
  Microscopic LVSI, no vs yes 3.64 1.72 to 7.68 0.001 2.49 1.08 to 5.78 0.032
  Non-partial necrosis vs partialnecrosis 5.21 2.41 to 11.3 0.001 4.79 2.19 to 10.5 0.001

Cox regression model, p<0.05 was considered significant.

AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HR, hazard ratio; LRT, locoregional therapy; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation