Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2017 Nov 6;38(1):125–139. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2017.09.010

Table 2.

Key studies assessing utility of empiric diets in EoE

Study (year) Empiric Diet # of
Subjects
Histologic
Response
Additional Findings
Children
Kagalwalla et al (2006)70 Six-food elimination 35 74%
  • Retrospective observational study comparing SFED with elemental formula diet.

  • Established that the SFED is associated with clinical and histologic improvement in EoE

Henderson et al (2012)54 26 81%*
  • Retrospective comparison of elemental, SFED, and allergy-testing directed diets, as outlined in Table 1

Kagalwalla et al (2017)74 Four-food elimination 78 64%
  • Prospective observational study

  • Patients with detectable specific IgE (>0.35 IU/mL) were less likely to respond to diet

Kagalwalla et al (2012)105 Milk only 17 65%*
  • Retrospective study of clinic cohort

Erwin et al (2016)57 21 62%*
  • Prospective observational study

  • Demonstrated that patients with low, and even undetectable, specific IgE to milk responded to milk elimination diet.

Adults
Gonsalves et al (2012)72 Six-food elimination 50 74%*
  • First study of SFED in adults.

  • Most common triggers: wheat and milk

  • SPT only predicted trigger foods in 13%

Lucendo et al (2013)76 67 73%*
  • Also excluded rice, corn, and legumes

  • 15 patients demonstrated remission at 2y

  • Most common triggers: milk, wheat, eggs, and legumes

Rodriguez-Sanchez et al (2014)56 17 53%*
  • Compared SFED to sIgE-targeted diets, as outlined in Table 1

Philpott et al (2016)69 56 52%*
  • Prospective, observational study in Australia comparing SFED to swallowed budesonide

Molina-Infante et al (2014)73 Four-food elimination 52 54%*
  • SFED successful in 31% of FFED non-responders

  • Milk was the most common trigger (50%)

SPT = Skin prick testing; APT = Atopy Patch Testing

<10 eosinophils/hpf;

*

< 15 eosinophils/hpf