. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 22.

Published in final edited form as: For Ecol Manage. 2013 Sep 13;310:234–241. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.056

Table 2.

List of herb species most strongly related to experimental treatments. Species are sorted decreasingly according to the fidelity value (phi coefficient) and treatment. Species fidelity to each treatment is marked by bolded values. The frequency (number of occurrences) of each species in each group is given. Species characteristics are marked using upper case characters: a – light-demanding oligotrophic species, b – shade-tolerant species, c – ruderal species

Species name	Heavy t.	Moderate t.	Control	Phi
Urtica dioica^c	10	1	1	42
Calamagrostis epigejos^c	10	2	1	38
Scrophularia nodosa^b	16	3	9	34
Hypericum perforatum^c	17	9	6	31
Agrostis capillaris^c	11	5	2	29
Cirsium arvense^c	5	1	0	28
Veronica chamaedrys agg.	15	9	5	27
Fragaria vesca	11	7	2	26
Clinopodium vulgare^a	8	8	2	24
Vicia hirsuta s. lat.	4	4	0	22
Hieracium sabaudum s.lat.	12	9	18	24