Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 5;8(70):115018–115027. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22983

Table 3. Univariate Cox regression analysis of the association between SF3B1 mutation and common prognostic factors.

All patients Luminal B patients PR-Negative patients
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Age 3.351 (2.093, 5.364) 0.000 6.414 (1.442, 28.528) 0.015 5.584 (2.187, 14.262) 0.000
N-Index 0.986 (0.581, 1.673) 0.958 1.455 (0.510, 4.154) 0.483 0.984 (0.385, 2.515) 0.972
ER status 7.920 (2.490, 25.192) 0.000 / / 7.679 (2.271, 25.965) 0.001
PR 1.750 (1.069, 2.865) 0.026 / / / /
HER2 0.458 (0.198, 1.063) 0.069 / / 0.522 (0.153, 1.776) 0.298
Menopausal state 2.430 (1.159, 5.092) 0.019 1.880 (0.243, 14.522) 0.545 3.118 (0.725, 13.421) 0.127
PAM50 and claudin-low 0.807 (0.662, 0.982) 0.033 / / 0.818 (0.615, 1.088) 0.168
Neoplasm Histologic Grade 0.859 (0.584, 1.263) 0.440 0.852 (0.333, 2.179) 0.738 0.507 (0.258, 0.994) 0.048
Breast cancer type 1.200 (1.017, 1.417) 0.031 1.643 (0.797, 3.384) 0.178 1.398 (0.709, 2.754) 0.333
Tumor stage 0.840 (0.575, 1.227) 0.367 0.985 (0.413, 2.350) 0.974 0.701 (0.335, 1.463) 0.344
Primary Tumor Laterality 1.030 (0.641, 1.655) 0.902 1.409 (0.466, 4.263) 0.543 1.006 (0.406, 2.493) 0.990

N-index, Nottingham prognostic index; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.