Table 1.
APIP patients characteristics by different pathogenic types
| Gallstone | HTGP | Idiopathic | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 44 | 39 | 32 | |
| Age* | 28 ± 5.3 | 28.7 ± 5.4 | 26.8 ± 5.8 | 0.331 |
| Gravidity* | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 2.5 ± 2.0 | 0.85 |
| Parity* | 1 ± 1 | 0.9 ± 0.9 | 1.0 ± 1.1 | 0.16 |
| Trimester of pregnancy on admission, n (%) | ||||
| Early (1–12 weeks) | 1 (2.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.1) | 0.88 |
| Mid (12–24 weeks) | 16 (36.4) | 15 (38.5) | 11 (34.4) | |
| Late (24–40 weeks) | 27 (61.4) | 24 (61.5) | 20 (62.5) | |
| Gestational weeks on admission | 29.7 ± 6.9 | 28.6 ± 7.7 | 33.7 ± 4.5 | 0.06 |
| Interval between diagnosis and delivery | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 2.3 ± 1.8 | 0.09 |
| Severity of APIP*, n (%) | ||||
| MAP | 24 (54.5) | 12 (30.8) | 18 (56.3) | 0.091 |
| MSAP | 15 (34.1) | 18 (46.2) | 12 (37.5) | |
| SAP | 5 (11.4) | 9 (23.1) | 2 (6.2) | |
| Localized complications, n (%) | ||||
| APFC | 13 (29.5) | 20 (51.3) | 6 (18.8) | 0.012 |
| Pancreatic pseudocyst | 1 (2.3) | 3 (7.7) | 1 (3.1) | |
| Acute necrosis | 1 (2.3) | 3 (7.7) | 1 (3.1) | |
| Encapsulated necrosis | 1 (2.3) | 3 (7.7) | 0 (0) | |
| Organ dysfunction, n (%) | ||||
| Respiratory | 13 (29.5) | 14 (35.9) | 9 (28.1) | 0.742 |
| Circulation | 1 (2.3) | 2 (5.1) | 1 (3.1) | |
| Kidney | 2 (4.6) | 4 (10.3) | 1 (3.1) | |
| Multiple organ dysfunction | 3 (6.8) | 4 (10.3) | 1 (3.1) | |
| History of hypertension, n (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.6) | 1 (3.1) | |
| History of diabetes, n (%) | 0 (0) | 6 (15.4) | 1 (3.1) | |
| Fatty liver disease, n (%) | 5 (11.4) | 7 (17.9) | 3 (9.4) | 0.518 |
| Ascite, n (%) | 17 (38.6) | 20 (51.3) | 9 (28.1) | 0.137 |
| Pleural effusion, n (%) | 20 (45.5) | 27 (69.2) | 17 (53.1) | 0.131 |
Quantitative data were presented as number and percentage and compared by χ2 Chi square test
APIP acute pancreatitis in pregnancy, HTGP hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis, MAP mild acute pancreatitis, MSAP moderate to severe acute pancreatitis, SAP severe acute pancreatitis, APFC acute peri-pancreatic fluid collection
*Data were compared using non-parametrical test