Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Sep 1;39(3):447–454. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw082

Table 2.

Proportion and the average annual change rate of functional limitations by education, age group, and sex, NHIS 2000–2014

ADL IADL Physical function



2000
%a
Change between
2000 and 2014
Percentage point
Annual
change rate
%
2000
%a
Change between
2000 and 2014
Percentage point
change
rate
%
2000

%a
Change between
2000 and 2014
Percentage point
Annual
change rate
%
All 5.0 0.9b 1.7** 12.6 −0.4 0.3 61.4 3.2c 2.0**
Education
Less than high school 7.3 3.9c 2.2**d 18.6 3.0b 0.4 68.7 5.6c 2.5**
High school 3.6 2.5c 2.6**d 9.8 2.7b 0.9*d 59.7 6.7c 2.1**
More than high school (reference) 4.3 −0.4 −0.1 10.5 −1.4 −0.3 56.3 3.8b 1.7**
Age group
65–74 years 3.1 0.3 1.5* 7.1 0.1 0.3 54.0 3.9b 2.0**d
75–84 years 5.8 0.5 1.5* 15 −1.7 0.1 66.2 2.2 1.7**d
≥85 years (reference) 11.8 4.3b 2.0* 33.3 −0.6 0.7 80.8 3.5 3.4**
Sex
Males 4.2 0.3 0.9 8.9 −0.3 −0.1 54.0 3.0b 2.0**
Females (reference) 5.6 1.4b 2.0** 15.3 −0.3 0.5 66.0 3.6c 2.1**

The analysis included 89 568 individuals aged 65 and above. The average annual change rate was estimated using a logistic model that adjusted for age group, sex, race, Hispanic origin, education and marital status. The annual change rate by subgroup was estimated by adding an interaction term between the trend variable and the characteristic of interest in the logistic model.

*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.001.

a

The proportion was weighted using the NHIS sampling weights.

b

The difference between 2000 and 2014 was statistically significant at P < 0.05.

c

The difference between 2000 and 2014 was statistically significant at P < 0.001.

d

The difference in the annual rate relative to that of the reference group was statistically significant at P < 0.05.