Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 7;7(1):e006612. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006612

Table 4.

Change in Each Variable of the HRV Analysis Among MI Subjects (n=35)

Rest Warm‐Up Warm‐Up—VT VT—Peak Recovery P Value
HF, ms2 60.3±57.6 54.5±62.1 28.7±32.7 3.3±6.9 23.1±37.1 <0.001
LF, ms2 115.9±145.1 105.4±134.8 47.3±66.9 7.6±10.8 45.3±85.2 <0.001
L/H 3.8±4.6 4.5±5.1 5.0±4.8 6.1±3.6 6.8±4.5 0.004
CVRR, % 2.5±0.9 2.9±1.0 2.1±0.7 1.7±0.4 2.9±0.9 <0.001

The data were compared using a mixed‐effect model. CVRR indicates coefficient of variation of RR intervals; HF, high‐frequency component; HRV, heart rate variability; L/H, ratio of LF and HF; LF, low‐frequency component; MI, myocardial infarction; VT, ventilator threshold.