Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 8;4(6):ENEURO.0311-16.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0311-16.2017

Table 8.

Model comparison for linguistic-cue based models, extended with (1) index and corpus frequency or (2) corpus and relative frequency

df AIC BIC logLik Deviance χ2 χ2 df Pr(>χ2)
prom 16 538126 538273 −269047 538094
prom.rel.freq 50 538042 538499 −268971 537942 152.68 34 <0.001
prom.freq.index 52 538034 538509 −268965 537930 11.77 2 0.00278

Note that the basic model is nested within both of the larger models, but the larger models are not nested and so the results of the likelihood-ratio test must be carefully interpreted. Model names reflect the predictor used; ‘rel’ refers to relative frequency and ‘freq’ refers to corpus frequency, while ‘prom’ indicates ‘prominence’, i.e. linguistic cues.