Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 18;6(5):778–794. doi: 10.1111/eva.12064

Table 7.

Genetic diversity parameters for preharvest pristine old‐growth and postharvest natural regeneration of white spruce in the same treatment blocks based on four genomic microsatellite loci. Values in parentheses are standard errors

Forest type Harvesting treatment Subpopulation A T A A e A R H o H e F
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
(1) Preharvest old‐growth and postharvest natural regeneration (individual subpopulation)
CD 75R E921 71 73 17.75 18.25 10.27 11.41 17.43 17.94 0.729 0.705 0.895 0.909 0.185 0.224
CD 50R E920 75 77 18.75 19.25 12.66 11.43 18.50 18.91 0.693 0.814 0.916 0.904 0.243 0.101
CD 20R E919 70 70 17.50 17.50 11.20 11.40 17.23 17.24 0.700 0.707 0.904 0.907 0.224 0.218
CD 10R E917 70 70 17.50 17.50 11.06 11.66 17.37 17.25 0.763 0.743 0.904 0.904 0.154 0.175
CD CCT E922 70 64 17.50 16.00 10.95 10.65 17.19 15.83 0.771 0.643 0.902 0.898 0.146 0.281
MW 75R E912 71 71 17.75 17.75 11.35 12.12 17.44 17.49 0.743 0.679 0.907 0.909 0.180 0.251
MW 50R E911 73 72 18.25 18.00 12.45 12.06 18.02 17.76 0.719 0.636 0.915 0.909 0.212 0.299
MW 20R E910 70 76 17.50 19.00 11.17 12.20 17.29 18.71 0.704 0.734 0.909 0.916 0.225 0.198
MW 10R E913 66 73 16.50 18.25 11.36 11.97 16.27 17.97 0.707 0.586 0.910 0.909 0.223 0.356
MW CCT E914 71 75 17.75 18.75 11.62 11.92 17.55 18.52 0.740 0.712 0.913 0.910 0.188 0.215
(2) Means for the preharvest old‐growth and postharvest natural regeneration (harvesting intensity wise)
75R 71.0 72.0 17.80 18.00 10.81 11.77 17.44 17.72 0.736 0.692 0.901 0.909 0.183 0.238
50R 74.0 74.5 18.50 18.63 12.56 11.75 18.26 18.34 0.706 0.725 0.916 0.907 0.228 0.200
20R 70.0 73.0 17.50 18.25 11.19 11.80 17.26 17.98 0.702 0.721 0.907 0.912 0.225 0.208
10R 68.0 71.5 17.00 17.88 11.21 11.82 16.82 17.61 0.735 0.665 0.907 0.907 0.189 0.266
CCT 70.5 69.5 17.60 17.38 11.29 11.29 17.37 17.18 0.756 0.678 0.908 0.904 0.167 0.248
(3) Overall means for the preharvest old‐growth and postharvest natural regeneration
71.0 72.0 17.68 18.03 11.41 11.68 17.43 17.76 0.727 0.696 0.907 0.907 0.198 0.232
(0.563) (0.779) (0.434) (0.554) (0.019) (0.018) (0.004) (0.004) (0.022) (0.021)

Details of the harvesting treatments are provided in Table 1. N, number of samples; A T, total number of alleles; A, mean number of alleles per locus; A e, effective number of alleles per locus; A R, allelic richness; H o, mean observed heterozygosity; H e, mean expected heterozygosity; anova showed insignificant differences between preharvest pristine old‐growth and postharvest natural regeneration for all seven parameters (Table S16).