Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 28;6(5):737–748. doi: 10.1111/eva.12059

Table 1.

Genetic variation within Malus sieversii and Malus orientalis

Species Site N H O H E F IS A R
M. sieversii a Ch Xinj 21 0.71 0.75 0.05b 3.5
Kaz 3 8 0.76 0.74 −0.03 3.5
Kaz Aksu 7 0.72 0.72 0.007 3.9
Kaz Kuz 13 0.69 0.72 0.05b 3.1
Kaz djun res 19 0.7 0.80 0.05 3.5
Kaz tauturgen 7 0.75 0.78 0.04a 3.2
Kaz unid 2 6 0.71 0.77 0.07 3.9
Overall 101 0.73 0.77 0.05b  
M. orientalis b ARA 10 0.82 0.81 −0.02 6.1
Djermuk 1 10 0.71 0.82 0.14b 5.7
Djermuk 2 9 0.74 0.77 0.03 5.4
Hermon 1 14 0.81 0.80 −0.02 6.5
Hermon 2 12 0.78 0.81 0.04b 6.2
Hermon 3 12 0.84 0.80 −0.06 6.1
Jermouck 13 0.77 0.84 0.08b 7.1
Khosrov Reserve 1 10 0.74 0.85 0.13b 6.5
Khosrov Reserve 5 8 0.81 0.84 0.03 6.5
Khosrov Reserve 6 15 0.80 0.82 0.03 6.3
Shikahogh 1 16 0.76 0.83 0.08b 6
Shikahogh 3 16 0.79 0.81 0.03 6
Vorotanpass 1 15 0.80 0.83 0.04b 6.3
Vorotanpass 2 21 0.77 0.78 0.02 5.9
Overall 211 0.79 0.83 0.06b  

N, sample size of each cluster, H O and H E, observed and expected heterozygosities, F IS, inbreeding coefficient, A R, mean allelic richness across loci, corrected by the rarefaction method.

a

For Malus sieversii, five sites (Ch pop1, Kaz Kokbu, Kaz Kotyr, Uzbe, Kaz Almat) with < 6 were excluded from these analyses. 0.05 <  0.01.

b

For Malus orientalis, 14 sites (KhosrovReserve 2, 3, 3bis, 3ter, 4, 7, 8, 9, unidentified, Arm unknown, Kaz Kokbu, Turkey, Russia, Shikahogh2) with < 6 were excluded from the analyses. < 0.001.