Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 23;13(1):e0191729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191729

Table 3. Geographic remoteness and BMI for immigrant men and women, 2006–2014.

  Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Model 4d
  Coeff 95% CI Coeff 95% CI Coeff 95% CI Coeff 95% CI
Men (n = 2 043, 9 192 observations)  
Fixed effects  
    Intercept (se) 27.0 (0.127) 26.8 (0.177) 26.2 (0.242) 26.2 (0.243)
    Time (0 = 2006) 0.057 (0.03,0.08) 0.058 (0.04,0.08) 0.059 (0.04,0.08) 0.061 (0.03,0.09)
Remoteness  
    Major city Reference Reference Reference Reference
    Inner regional Australia -0.25 (-0.77,0.27) -0.37 (-0.89,0.15) -0.61 (-1.15,-0.08) -0.52 (-1.10,0.06)
    Outer regional Australia 0.79 (0.08,1.50) 0.60 (-0.10,1.30) 0.31 (-0.40,1.02) 0.20 (-0.59,0.98)
    Remote and very remote -0.25 (-2.02,1.52) -0.65 (-2.38,1.09) -0.74 (-2.46,0.99) -0.62 (-2.60,1.37)
Interaction  
    Major city*time Reference
    Inner regional Australia*time -0.03 (-0.09,0.04)
    Outer regional Australia*time 0.03 (-0.07,0.13)
    Remote and very remote*time -0.03 (-0.27,0.21)
Women (n = 2 250, 10 212 observations) 
Fixed effects  
    Intercept 25.3 (0.150) 25.7 (0.208) 24.4 (0.284) 24.2 (0.306)
    Time (0 = 2006) 0.077 (0.05,0.10) 0.079 (0.06,0.10) 0.079 (0.06,0.10) 0.071 (0.04,0.10)
Remoteness  
    Major city Reference Reference Reference Reference
    Inner regional Australia -0.10 (-0.75,0.56) -0.26 (-0.90,0.38) -0.70 (-1.34,-0.06) -0.80 (-1.70,-0.12)
    Outer regional Australia 1.01 (0.21,1.80) 0.71 (-0.07,1.48) 0.17 (-0.61,0.94) 0.17 (-0.69,1.03)
    Remote and very remote -0.08 (-2.03,1.88) -0.20 (-2.08,1.69) -0.32 (-2.16,1.52) -0.14 (-2.18,1.89)
Interaction  
    Major city*time Reference
    Inner regional Australia*time 0.02 (-0.05,0.09)
    Outer regional Australia*time -0.01 (-0.11,0.10)
    Remote and very remote*time -0.03 (-0.27,0.21)

Abbreviations: Coeff, coefficient.

aModel 1: Geographic remoteness adjusted for baseline age, age squared and survey year.

bModel 2: Model 1 plus adjustment for ethnicity.

cModel 3: Model 2 plus adjustment for neighbourhood disadvantage, education, occupation, household income.

dModel 4: Model 3 plus interaction (geographic remoteness*year). Bold p<0.05