Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 14;7(3):257–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2012.00391.x

Table 6.

Posterior median and 95% posterior credible intervals (PCI) of the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the HI test, assuming different performance by species (HIchicken and HIturkey) and source of infection (HInatural and HIexperimental)

Test evaluated Null hypothesis (H0) POPR*
Species HIchicken HIturkey
Se 98·9 [96·1; 100] 98·1 [92·6; 99·9] Se HIchicken < Se HIturkey 0·3539
Sp 99·5 [98·1; 100] 99·1 [96·0; 100] Sp HIchicken < Sp HIturkey 0·3597
Source of infection HInatural HIexperimental
Se 99·3 [97·0; 100] 91·1 [85·1; 98·9] Se HInatural < Se HIexperimental 0·0222
Sp 99·6 [98·5; 100] 81·2 [59·5; 98·6] Sp HInatural < Sp HIexperimental 0·0002

*POPR, Bayesian posterior probability.