Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 6;7(3):349–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2012.00386.x

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis of the included studies

Variables Number of studies Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Likelihood ratio+ Likelihood ratio‐ AUROC (95% CI) Diagnostic OR (95% CI) I 2 (95% CI) Publication bias (Egger’s test P)
Procalcitonin
 Overall analysis 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 6 0·84 (0·75–0·90) 0·64 (0·58–0·69) 2·31 (1·93–2·78) 0·26 (0·17–0·40) 0·68 (0·64–0·72) 8·55 (5·04–14·5) 0·0 (0·0–74·62) 0·518
 ICU 13 , 14 , 16 3 0·91 (0·82–0·97) 0·62 (0·52–0·72) 2·53 (1·90–3·30) 0·14 (0·06–0·31) 0·73 (0·50–0·99) 17·9 (6·98–45·8) 0·0 (0·0–84·69) 0·311
 MDI 12 , 13 , 14 3 0·89 (0·77–0·92) 0·61 (0·53–0·67) 2·30 (1·82–2·93) 0·23 (0·14–0·39) 0·79 (0·49–0·99) 9·93 (3·49–28·3) 46·1 (0·0–84·1) 0·518

ICU, intensive care unit; MDI, microbiologically documented infection.