Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 23;8:1433. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19757-5

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The most efficient active case finding (ACF) strategy in different settings. A summary of the most efficient ACF strategy based on (a,c,e) incremental net benefit of each strategies without treatment management and (b,d,f) maximum threshold resource requirements for enhanced case management for strategies in different population setting. Different ACF strategies were compared with current practice in different settings in which the prevalence of untreated active TB prior to intervention was varied, along with (a,b) the percentage of multi-drug/rifampicin resistant (MDR) TB among the untreated active TB cases, (c,d) the proportion of individuals lost to follow-up (LTFU) whilst awaiting GeneXpert results or (e,f) the homeless population size. Default parameter values in Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Table S3 were used. The “INB < 0” result indicates that no option had a positive INB with a QALY valued at £20,000. Panels (a,b) and (e,f) represent scenarios in which all individuals screened with GeneXpert wait for test results (no LTFU).