Table 2.
Parameter | Biostimulant treatment group1 | Pepton application rate2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Pepton-2 | Pepton-3 | Pepton-4 | Acadian | SEM | Linear (P =) | Quadratic (P =) | Cubic (P =) | |
Root length (cm) | 20.11c | 22.14b | 22.47b | 23.46a | 22.27b | 0.227 | <0.001 | 0.453 | 0.184 |
PLANT HEIGHT (m) | |||||||||
Evaluation 13 | 1.69c | 1.72b | 1.73ab | 1.75a | 1.74ab | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.888 | 0.716 |
Evaluation 23 | 1.76d | 1.79bc | 1.80ab | 1.82a | 1.81ab | 0.007 | <0.001 | 0.811 | 0.516 |
STEM DIAMETER (cm) | |||||||||
Evaluation 1 | 1.13c | 1.25b | 1.32a | 1.34a | 1.33a | 0.020 | <0.001 | 0.314 | 0.429 |
Evaluation 2 | 1.61d | 1.79c | 1.86bc | 2.09a | 1.94b | 0.035 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.068 |
LEAF LENGTH (cm) | |||||||||
Evaluation 1 | 38.54d | 40.19c | 41.56b | 42.18a | 41.10b | 0.206 | <0.001 | 0.924 | 0.115 |
Evaluation 2 | 39.93d | 43.81c | 44.13bc | 44.69a | 44.47ab | 0.187 | <0.001 | 0.035 | 0.035 |
LEAVES PER PLANT (n) | |||||||||
Evaluation 1 | 12.70c | 16.00ab | 16.25ab | 17.10a | 15.65b | 0.392 | <0.001 | 0.056 | 0.285 |
Evaluation 2 | 14.45c | 16.60b | 17.55b | 18.95a | 18.65a | 0.241 | <0.001 | 0.552 | 0.553 |
HEAD TO BOUQUET FLOWER (cm) | |||||||||
Evaluation 1 | 24.50a | 22.86b | 22.64b | 22.82b | 22.77b | 0.287 | <0.001 | 0.013 | 0.996 |
Evaluation 2 | 23.95a | 20.34b | 20.73b | 20.49b | 21.36b | 0.367 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.107 |
CLUSTER SET (cm)4 | |||||||||
Evaluation 1 | 39.15a | 37.95ab | 37.48b | 37.38b | 37.00b | 0.541 | 0.013 | 0.563 | 0.881 |
Evaluation 2 | 39.51a | 36.72b | 35.89c | 35.16d | 35.87c | 0.119 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.544 |
Fruit diameter (cm) | 2.39c | 2.60b | 2.67b | 2.79a | 2.67b | 0.025 | <0.001 | 0.957 | 0.407 |
Estimated tomato yield (kg/EU)5 | 85.5c | 103.9c | 106.8b | 109.1a | 106.0c | 2.071 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.387 |
Estimated tomato yield (Ton/ha)5 | 28.52d | 34.63c | 35.61b | 36.38a | 35.34b | 0.690 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.388 |
Vegetative parameter values are an average of 20 plants from 4 plots (5 plants per plot) for each treatment group. Treatments were: control, no biostimulant; Pepton at 2, 3, or 4 kg/ha (Pepton-2, Pepton-3, and Pepton-4, respectively); and Acadian at 1.5 L/ha. Biostimulant application 1 was provided 15 days after transplant and the remaining applications were provided every 2 weeks thereafter.
Linear, quadratic, and cubic treatment contrasts for the effect of Pepton application rates 2, 3, and 4 kg/ha with control serving as 0 kg Pepton/ha.
First and second evaluations were done 56 and 61 days after the initial application of biostimulant.
Fruit set distance between the entire cluster and cluster flowering fruit set.
Values are an average of 4 plots for each treatment group. E.U. = Experimental unit.
Treatment means within row with uncommon superscripts differ (P < 0.05) using the Tukey test.