Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 5;7(5):815–826. doi: 10.1111/irv.12031

Table 2.

Emulsion composition and physical characterization

Emulsion Oil (% v/v) Surfactant (% w/v) Excipients Dilution for injection Hemolysis (%) Zeta potential (mV) Dynamic viscosity (cP) pH
EM057 Squalene (10) P188 (1·9) 0·1 −5·5 1·9 7·6
EM016 Squalene (10) P80 (1·9) 0·1 −12·6 1·5 6·2
EM074 Squalene (10) eggPC (1·9) 0·1 −15·1 1·5 7·1
EM059 MCT (10) eggPC (1·9) 0·4 −25·7 1·6 4·2
EM058 Squalene (10) eggPC/P188 (1·9/0·1) Phosphate buffer 0·6 −6·3 1·6 5·5
EM030 Squalene (10) eggPC/P188 (1·9/0·1) Phosphate buffer, glycerol 0·1 −4·5 1·6 5·6
EM001 Squalene (10) eggPC/P188 (1·9/0·1) Phosphate buffer, glycerol, α‐toc 0·0 −7·0 NM 5·6
EM022* Squalene (5) P80/S85 (0·5/0·5) Citrate buffer 0·1 −22·3 1·2 6·1

Hemolysis measured near date of manufacture; zeta potential, viscosity, and pH measured ∼3 months post‐manufacture. To more closely mimic MF59®, EM022 was manufactured at 5%25v/v oil, whereas all other emulsions were manufactured at 10% v/v oil (corresponding physical measurements could be affected by the lower oil content in EM022, e.g. viscosity).

MCT, medium‐chain triglyceride; eggPC, egg phosphatidylcholine; P80, polysorbate 80; P188, poloxamer 188; S85, sorbitan trioleate; α‐toc, α‐tocopherol; NM, not measured.