Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 23;20:6. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0930-6

Table 2.

Association between preeclampsia and breast cancer among the nationwide cohort and KARMA cohort

Condition Number of breast cancer cases IRR (95% CI)
Model 1 Model 2
Nationwide cohort (N = 1,337,934)
Preeclampsia
 No 26447 1.00 (REF) 1.00 (REF)
 Yes 1179 0.88 (0.83; 0.94) 0.90 (0.85; 0.96)
 once 1082 0.90 (0.84; 0.95) 0.91 (0.86; 0.97)
 multiple times 97 0.76 (0.62; 0.92) 0.81 (0.66; 0.99)
KARMA cohort (N = 55,044)
Preeclampsia
 No 2410 1.00 (REF) 1.00 (REF)
 Yes 86 0.77 (0.62; 0.95) 0.75 (0.61; 0.93) a

Model 1 adjusted for calendar period (10-year categories). Model 2 further adjusted for number of births, age at first birth, weight status categories, smoking status and education level. The underlying time scale was attained age. Significant associations are denoted in bold

Abbreviations: IRR incidence rate ratio, CI confidence interval

aFor model 2 in the KARMA cohort, we additionally adjusted for alcohol use, age at menarche, body shape at age 18 years, physical activity at age 18 years and irregular menstrual cycles in adult life