Table 4.

Statistical ranges (maximum minus minimum values of the distribution) of the differences (%) between estimating $\mathrm{\Delta }Mort-CC$ with the upper limit of each adaptation modeling method (shown in parentheses) and with no adaptation.

City	Absolute threshold shift ($\mathrm{Thresh}°\mathrm{C}=4°\mathrm{C}$)	Relative threshold shift ($\mathrm{Thresh}\%=100\%$)	Reduction in the slope of the ERF ($\mathrm{Slope}=25\%$)	Absolute threshold shift combined with reduction in slope of ERF ($\mathrm{Thresh}°\mathrm{C}+\mathrm{Sens}=4°\mathrm{C}+25\%$)	Relative threshold shift combined with reduction in slope of ERF ($\mathrm{Thresh}\%+\mathrm{Sens}=100\%+25\%$)	Analog ERF (Analog)
Athens	44	93	27	66	105	0
Barcelona	48	89	36	72	106	0
Budapest	42	89	32	66	101	15
Helsinki	61	96	26	74	100	48
Ljubljana	40	89	28	58	97	94
London	58	100	26	74	105	68
Milan	37	100	24	54	103	13
Paris	51	100	27	67	106	33
Prague	43	89	30	64	100	41
Rome	42	96	26	60	104	22
Stockholm	62	100	25	75	100	25
Turin	79	100	18	82	100	82
Valencia	45	85	38	77	108	608
Zurich	40	94	25	63	100	13
Mean	49	94	28	68	103	76a

Note: The values describe the width of each bar in Figure 3. $\mathrm{\Delta }Mort-CC$, heat-related mortality rate attributable to climate change; ERF, Exposure Response Function; Thresh, threshold.

^a$\text{The}\text{mean}=35$ if the result for Valencia (608) is removed.