Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 15;35(2):375–392. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5256

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

Effects of blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) on beam walk, beam balance, and working memory performance (n = 10/group). (A) Beam walk performance did not differ significantly between the bTBI and sham groups (p = 0.2, bTBI vs. sham). (B) Beam balance performance did not differ significantly between the bTBI and sham groups (p = 0.06, bTBI vs. Sham). (C) bTBI and sham group times to locate the goal platform on post-injury days 11–14. (D) bTBI and sham group latencies combined across all post-injury days. Neither the individual day nor the combined latencies differed significantly between the bTBI and sham groups (p = 0.067, bTBI vs. sham). (E) Differences in latencies to the goal platform between the first and second trials for each pair of trials in the bTBI and sham groups (n = 10/group). One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the differences in latencies combined across all 5 days were significantly longer in the sham group than in the bTBI group, suggesting that bTBI resulted in significantly impaired working memory. Values are plotted as means ± SEM. *p < 0.01 versus sham.