Table 2.

Interrater Reliabilities for VIP:CIT Subsections, Pilot and Revised Versions

Subsection	Krippendorff’s α
	State 1		State 2		State 3
	Period 1	Period 2	Period 1	Period 2	Period 1	Period 2
Section 1: Development of the Plan	.30	.11	−.21	.67b	−.26	−.14
Section 2: Involvement of Stakeholders	.11	.12	−.28	.26	−.11	−.42
Section 3: Involvement of Policy and Regulations	.43	.48	−.22	.00	−.08	−.93
Section 4: Presentation of Data on Injury and Violence Burden & Current Efforts Implemented	.78b	.74b	.88c	.95c	.47	.47
Section 5: State Goals	.55	.78b	.16	.60	−.18	.58
Section 6: Objectives	.64	.87c	.27	.58	−.04	.22
Section 7: Strategies for Interventions	.62	.65	.60	.60	.44	−.05
Section 8: Reducing Injury and Violence Disparities	−.25	.71b	.22	.15	−.18	−.12
Section 9: Implementation of Plan	−.01	.15	.32	−.10	.31	.12
Section 10: Resources for Implementation	.21	.03	−.14	−.40	−.24	−.12
Section 11: Evaluation	.08	.00	−.13	.26	−.26	−.11
Section 12: Plan Accessibility and Usability	.61	.67b	.47	.15	−.02	.38
Total (all items)	.56	.62	.45	.65	.28	.50

^aBolded cells indicate where interrater reliability improved 0.10 points or more from period 1 to period 2.

^bScores at or above .66.

^cScores at or above .80.