Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 25.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):395–406. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.395

Table 4.

Comparison of Standardized Biases After Matching: Male Participants

Variable All male participants Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 Method 5
Propensity score 0.44 0.08 0.06 −0.01 0.08
Maternal substance use history −0.12 0.08 0.12 −0.01 −0.02
Maternal years of schooling −0.05 −0.01 0.16 0.04 0.06
Family income −0.18 −0.11 0.20 −0.12 −0.04
Below poverty threshold 0.14 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.05
Teacher rating of underachievement −0.03 −0.06 0.14 −0.16 −0.10
Teacher rating of aggression 0.24 0.00 0.13 −0.04 −0.02
Teacher rating of shyness −0.09 0.01 0.08 −0.03 −0.02
Teacher rating of immaturity 0.07 0.05 0.10 −0.01 0.03
Teacher rating of inattention 0.13 0.00 0.13 −0.06 −0.04
Precision relative to a 1:1 match 1.00 0.95 1.15 0.95
N 216 156 216 216 216

Note. Standardized bias is defined as the weighted difference in means divided by the standard deviation in the full group of participants who were not heavy marijuana users. Numbers in bold indicate standardized biases that decreased in comparison with the original sample. Methods are as follows: 1 = 1:1 optimal nearest neighbor matching; 2 = 2:1 optimal nearest neighbor matching (could not be done for male participants because there were not twice as many male participants who were not heavy marijuana users as there were male participants who were heavy users); 3 = six subclasses; 4 = full matching; 5 = constrained full matching.