Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191320

Fig 3. Learning curves of trace eyeblink condition with 100 dB tone CS and 75 dB tone CS.

Fig 3

The individual and mean value ± SEM for the percentage of SR (A), the percentage of CR (B), CR peak amplitude (C), and CR peak latency (D) in the 75 dB group (n = 8; individual: dash gray line; mean value: black solid circle) and 100 dB group (n = 8; individual: solid gray line; mean value: black solid triangle). Error bars represent the SEM. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed that there were significant effects of the group on the SR%, CR%, CR peak amplitude and CR peak latency [SR%: F(1, 14) = 36.902, p < 0.001; CR%: F(1, 14) = 58.842, p < 0.001; CR peak amplitude: F(1, 14) = 12.009, p = 0.004; CR peak latency: F(1, 14) = 27.71, p < 0.001]. Significant effects of the session were found in CR%, CR peak amplitude and CR peak latency [CR%: F(9, 126) = 40.155, p < 0.001; CR peak amplitude: F(9, 126) = 23.408, p < 0.001; CR peak latency: F(9, 126) = 15.140, p < 0.001]. Differences between groups were statistically significant in the indicated sessions. *p < 0.05; two-way repeated measure ANOVA followed by post-hoc test.