Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 25.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Dermatol. 2015 Apr 29;172(6):1498–1506. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13626

Table 2.

Retrospective cohort studies evaluating the risk of cutaneous melanoma in BRCA1 families

Study Patient demographic Study design Method of obtaining cancer status Follow-up Sample size of cohort RR 95% CI P-value
Thompson 200234 Western Europe and North America Cohort: individuals from 699 BRCA1 families ascertained by the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Subjects included tested mutation carriers, patients with ovarian cancer, male patients with breast cancer, women diagnosed with breast cancer at < 60 years and first-degree relatives of individuals in any of these categories
Control: compared with incidence in the general population
ICD codes from medical record. Histological confirmation was available for some but not all cases 1960–1999 11 847 1·11 0·58–2·15 0·7
Moran 201235 North West and West Midlands of England Cohort: patients in a BRCA1 family who tested positive for a mutation or were obligate carriers based on pedigree analysis Control: compared with incidence in the general population Cancer diagnosis obtained from patient history. All cancers confirmed by regional cancer registry 1975–2005 1815 0·9 0·1–3·1 NA
Johannsson 199930 Southern Sweden Cohort: pedigree analysis of large BRCA1/2 families in which index cases were confirmed to have BRCA1/2 mutations by genetic testing. Risk was assessed for the family as a whole, including mutation carriers and nonmutation carriers, though family branches that were proved or suspected of being noncarriers were excluded
Control: compared with incidence in the general population
ICD-7 codes from the population-based Census Registry and the Swedish Cancer Registries 1958–1995 1145 1·23 0·15–4·43 0·68
Brose 200233 Michigan and Pennsylvania, USA Cohort: BRCA1 mutation carriers in 147 families were identified in two academic breast and ovarian cancer risk evaluation clinics. BRCA1 mutation carriers were identified either on the basis of direct genetic testing or as presumed carriers. Presumed carriers were defined as being in the line of descent between two tested mutation carriers or between a mutation carrier and an individual with breast or ovarian cancer
Control: compared with incidence in the general population
Personal interview or mailed questionnaire 10 years: patients recruited from 1991 to 1994 483 2·5a 1·1–3·9 NA

RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; NA, not available.

a

This is the cumulative age adjusted risk. The RR was not calculated.